I recently read a great (series) of articles by Ben Cowgill that outline the fuzzy nature of the law when it comes to print advertising – never mind online advertising. The articles center around the recent, tragic crash of Comair flight 5191 near Lexington Kentucky. But the issue isn’t the cause of the crash or story of the victims, per se, it’s about the swarm of ads that came out in the wake of the crash.
In the same vein as a recent CaseDetails post, Cowgill explores local and national law firms’ advertisements placed shortly after the crash as well as how the Kentucky Advertising Commission is reacting to those ads. I’ll leave it to you to follow the links and read the articles in full, but the interesting thing is what Cowgill only begins to explore. Don’t get me wrong, the articles are excellent and exactly what they should be, but I’ve enjoyed pondering
As these matters are clarified, it will be interesting to see how lawyers are directed to conduct their legal advertising campaigns. In addition, we’ll see if any caviats are created to accommodate the Internet as both an active and passive advertising medium. We shall see.
[tags]legal advertising,comair 5191,online advertising[/tags]
Related posts: