Checking Your Links Too Often?

Update: see Adam Lasnik’s comment below

I read an interesting post on seoblackhat.com today saying that Adam Lasnik of Google confirmed that their “link:www.mysite.com” query i) isn’t very accurate and ii) is seen as a “spammy” request by Google. In other words, people hammering Google.com with “link:www.mysite.com” are effectively revealing themselves as ~nefariously involved~ with SEO. Is this, or will this be, one of Google’s metrics for determining sites that stink of SEO?

Related question: if “link:www.mysite.com” is a no-no, how about “site:www.mysite.com”?

Relevant Resources

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Written by jclayc on September 25th, 2006 with 2 comments.
Read more articles on General SEO Discussion and SEO for Law Firms.

Related articles

2 comments

Read the comments left by other users below, or:

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com Adam Lasnik
#1. September 25th, 2006, at 9:33 PM.

Okay, okay, this is becoming like a game of telephone.

“Did you hear that Adam said that any Webmasters who use link: more than three times in a row are *definitely* black hats, and all of their sites will get instantly moved to position 666? And their pets will develop ulcerated sores and all of their t-shirts will come out of the dryer… INSIDE OUT! :o

Lost in all of the commotion were the core points I made in response to the question about the link operator at the seminar:
1) A TINY (albeit not unimportant) percentage of Google’s users values the link: operator.
2) We’re always trying to allocate engineering time and resources where they can do the most good.
3) We haven’t ruled out improving the link: operator in the future.

Hope this sets the record straight, or at least a bit straighter :-)

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com jclayc
#2. September 26th, 2006, at 12:29 PM.

Thanks for the comment, Adam! I hyped the “scale” of the comment a bit just to incite comments about the (available but) slippery slope of user behavior as a determinant in rankings. Good to see you’ve got a sense of humor!

One of the reasons it caught my attention is because I use the link: operator but want to stay “on the right side of the law” as it were…

Leave your comment...

If you want to leave your comment on this article, simply fill out the next form:




You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .